Long-term effect of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised trial

Authors

Gil I. Wolfe, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Henry J. Kaminski, School of Medicine and Health Sciences
Inmaculada B. Aban, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Greg Minisman, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Hui Chien Kuo, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Alexander Marx, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Philipp Ströbel, Universität Göttingen
Claudio Mazia, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Joel Oger, The University of British Columbia
J. Gabriel Cea, Universidad de Chile
Jeannine M. Heckmann, University of Cape Town
Amelia Evoli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
Wilfred Nix, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz
Emma Ciafaloni, University of Rochester Medical Center
Giovanni Antonini, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Rawiphan Witoonpanich, Mahidol University
John O. King, University of Melbourne
Said R. Beydoun, University of Southern California
Colin H. Chalk, Université McGill
Alexandru C. Barboi, Medical College of Wisconsin
Anthony A. Amato, Harvard Medical School
Aziz I. Shaibani, Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Bashar Katirji, Case Western Reserve University
Bryan R.F. Lecky, The Walton Centre
Camilla Buckley, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
Angela Vincent, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
Elza Dias-Tosta, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
Hiroaki Yoshikawa, Kanazawa University
Márcia Waddington-Cruz, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Michael T. Pulley, University of Florida
Michael H. Rivner, Augusta University

Document Type

Article

Abstract

© 2019 Elsevier Ltd Background: The Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) showed that thymectomy combined with prednisone was superior to prednisone alone in improving clinical status as measured by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis at 3 years. We investigated the long-term effects of thymectomy up to 5 years on clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events. Methods: We did a rater-blinded 2-year extension study at 36 centres in 15 countries for all patients who completed the randomised controlled MGTX and were willing to participate. MGTX patients were aged 18 to 65 years at enrolment, had generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years' duration, had acetylcholine receptor antibody titres of 1·00 nmol/L or higher (or concentrations of 0·50–0·99 nmol/L if diagnosis was confirmed by positive edrophonium or abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation, or abnormal single fibre electromyography), had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II–IV disease, and were on optimal anticholinesterase therapy with or without oral corticosteroids. In MGTX, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either thymectomy plus prednisone or prednisone alone. All patients in both groups received oral prednisone at doses titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved minimal manifestation status. The primary endpoints of the extension phase were the time-weighted means of the QMG score and alternate-day prednisone dose from month 0 to month 60. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294658. It is closed to new participants, with follow-up completed. Findings: Of the 111 patients who completed the 3-year MGTX, 68 (61%) entered the extension study between Sept 1, 2009, and Aug 26, 2015 (33 in the prednisone alone group and 35 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group). 50 (74%) patients completed the 60-month assessment, 24 in the prednisone alone group and 26 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group. At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted mean QMG scores (5·47 [SD 3·87] vs 9·34 [5·08]; p=0·0007) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg [SD 21] vs 48 mg [29]; p=0·0002) than did those in the prednisone alone group. 14 (42%) of 33 patients in the prednisone group, and 12 (34%) of 35 in the thymectomy plus prednisone group, had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths were reported during the extension phase. Interpretation: At 5 years, thymectomy plus prednisone continues to confer benefits in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis compared with prednisone alone. Although caution is appropriate when generalising our findings because of the small sample size of our study, they nevertheless provide further support for the benefits of thymectomy in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis. Funding: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Publication Date

3-1-2019

Publication Title

The Lancet Neurology

ISSN

14744422

E-ISSN

14744465

Volume

18

Issue

3

First Page

259

Last Page

268

PubMed ID

30692052

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30392-2

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS