Inter-laboratory variability in in vitro spinal segment flexibility testing

Document Type

Article

Abstract

In vitro spine flexibility testing has been performed using a variety of laboratory-specific loading apparatuses and conditions, making test results across laboratories difficult to compare. The application of pure moments has been well established for spine flexibility testing, but to our knowledge there have been no attempts to quantify differences in range of motion (ROM) resulting from laboratory-specific loading apparatuses. Seven fresh-frozen lumbar cadaveric motion segments were tested intact at four independent laboratories. Unconstrained pure moments of 7.5. Nm were applied in each anatomic plane without an axial preload. At laboratories A and B, pure moments were applied using hydraulically actuated spinal loading fixtures with either a passive (A) or controlled (B) XY table. At laboratories C and D, pure moments were applied using a sliding (C) or fixed ring (D) cable-pulley system with a servohydraulic test frame. Three sinusoidal load-unload cycles were applied at laboratories A and B while a single quasistatic cycle was applied in 1.5. Nm increments at laboratories C and D. Non-contact motion measurement systems were used to quantify ROM. In all test directions, the ROM variability among donors was greater than single-donor ROM variability among laboratories. The maximum difference in average ROM between any two laboratories was 1.5° in flexion-extension, 1.3° in lateral bending and 1.1° in axial torsion. This was the first study to quantify ROM in a single group of spinal motion segments at four independent laboratories with varying pure moment systems. These data support our hypothesis that given a well-described test method, independent laboratories can produce similar biomechanical outcomes. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

Flexibility testing, Laboratory comparison, Lumbar spine range of motion, Pure moment, Spine biomechanics

Publication Date

9-2-2011

Publication Title

Journal of Biomechanics

ISSN

00219290

E-ISSN

18732380

Volume

44

Issue

13

First Page

2383

Last Page

2387

PubMed ID

21764061

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.034

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS