Comparing stand-alone endovascular embolization versus stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III: a propensity score matched study
Document Type
Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III. METHODS: This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. RESULTS: The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03).Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed.
Medical Subject Headings
Humans; Radiosurgery (methods); Embolization, Therapeutic (methods); Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations (therapy, diagnostic imaging, surgery); Male; Adolescent; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Female; Child; Adult; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Aged; Child, Preschool; Treatment Outcome; Aged, 80 and over; Infant; Endovascular Procedures (methods); Follow-Up Studies
Publication Date
11-18-2025
Publication Title
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
E-ISSN
1759-8486
Volume
17
Issue
12
First Page
1382
Last Page
1390
PubMed ID
39366733
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1136/jnis-2024-022326
Recommended Citation
Musmar, Basel; Adeeb, Nimer; Roy, Joanna M.; Abdalrazeq, Hammam; Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula I.; Atallah, Elias; Salim, Hamza Adel; Kondziolka, Douglas; Sheehan, Jason; Ogilvy, Christopher S.; Riina, Howard; Kandregula, Sandeep; Dmytriw, Adam A.; El Naamani, Kareem; Abdelsalam, Ahmed; Ironside, Natasha; Kumbhare, Deepak; Ataoglu, Cagdas; Essibayi, Muhammed Amir; Keles, Abdullah; Muram, Sandeep; Sconzo, Daniel; Rezai, Arwin; Erginoglu, Ufuk; Pöppe, Johannes; Sen, Rajeev D.; Griessenauer, Christoph J.; Burkhardt, Jan-Karl; Starke, Robert M.; Baskaya, Mustafa K.; and Sekhar, Laligam N., "Comparing stand-alone endovascular embolization versus stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III: a propensity score matched study" (2025). Neurosurgery. 2252.
https://scholar.barrowneuro.org/neurosurgery/2252