Adoption of Advanced Microneurosurgical Technologies: An International Survey
Document Type
Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Operating microscopes and adjunctive technologies are continually refined to advance microneurosurgical care. How frequently these advances are used is unknown. In the present study, we assessed the international adoption of microneurosurgical technologies and discussed their value. METHODS: A 27-question electronic survey was distributed to cerebrovascular neurosurgeon members of U.S., European, and North American neurosurgical societies and social media networks of cerebrovascular and skull base neurosurgeons. The survey encompassed the surgeons' training background, surgical preferences, and standard microneurosurgical practices. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 56% (53 of 95) were attendings, 74% (70 of 95) were in their first 10 years of practice, and 67% (63 of 94) practiced at an academic teaching hospital. Vascular, endovascular, and skull base fellowships had been completed by 38% (36 of 95), 27% (26 of 95), and 32% (30 of 95) of the respondents, respectively. Most respondents did not use an exoscope (78%; 73 of 94), a mouthpiece (61%; 58 of 95), or foot pedals (56%; 55 of 94). All 95 respondents used a microscope, and 71 (75%) used Zeiss microscopes. Overall, 57 neurosurgeons (60%) used indocyanine green for aneurysms (n = 54), arteriovenous malformations (n = 43), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (n = 42). Most (80%; 75 of 94) did not use fluorescence. The respondents with a vascular-focused practice more commonly used indocyanine green, Yellow 560 fluorescence, and intraoperative 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. The respondents with a skull base-focused practice more commonly used foot pedals and an endoscope-assist device. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present survey have characterized the current adoption of operative microscopes and adjunctive technologies in microneurosurgery. Despite numerous innovations to improve the symbiosis between neurosurgeon and microscope, their adoption has been underwhelming. Future advances are essential to improve surgical outcomes.
Medical Subject Headings
Adult; Biomedical Technology (methods, trends); Female; Humans; Internationality; Male; Microsurgery (methods, trends); Middle Aged; Neurosurgeons (trends); Neurosurgical Procedures (methods, trends); Surveys and Questionnaires
Publication Date
1-1-2022
Publication Title
World neurosurgery
E-ISSN
1878-8769
Volume
157
First Page
e473
Last Page
e483
PubMed ID
34687936
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.128
Recommended Citation
Srinivasan, Visish M.; Shlobin, Nathan A.; Karahalios, Katherine; Scherschinski, Lea; Rahmani, Redi; Graffeo, Christopher S.; Burkhardt, Jan-Karl; Chaurasia, Bipin; Catapano, Joshua S.; Labib, Mohamed A.; and Lawton, Michael T., "Adoption of Advanced Microneurosurgical Technologies: An International Survey" (2022). Neurosurgery. 1559.
https://scholar.barrowneuro.org/neurosurgery/1559