Bioethical considerations in translational research: Primate stroke
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Controversy and activism have long been linked to the subject of primate research. Even in the midst of raging ethical debates surrounding fertility treatments, genetically modified foods and stem-cell research, there has been no reduction in the campaigns of activists worldwide. Plying their trade of intimidation aimed at ending biomedical experimentation in all animals, they have succeeded in creating an environment where research institutions, often painted as guilty until proven innocent, have avoided addressing the issue for fear of becoming targets. One area of intense debate is the use of primates in stroke research. Despite the fact that stroke kills more people each year than AIDS and malaria, and less than 5% of patients are candidates for current therapies, there is significant opposition to primate stroke research. A balanced examination of the ethics of primate stroke research is thus of broad interest to all areas of biomedical research. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Keywords
Ethics, Neuroprotection, Primate, Research, Stroke
Publication Date
5-1-2009
Publication Title
American Journal of Bioethics
ISSN
15265161
E-ISSN
15360075
Volume
9
Issue
5
First Page
3
Last Page
12
PubMed ID
19396671
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1080/15265160902788652
Recommended Citation
Sughrue, Michael E.; Mocco, J.; Mack, Willam J.; Ducruet, Andrew F.; Komotar, Ricardo J.; Fischbach, Ruth L.; Martin, Thomas E.; and Connolly, E. Sander, "Bioethical considerations in translational research: Primate stroke" (2009). Translational Neuroscience. 2063.
https://scholar.barrowneuro.org/neurobiology/2063