Comparison of aspiration-first versus stentriever-first techniques in performing mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions
Document Type
Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both stentriever and direct-aspiration thrombectomy effectively treat large-vessel occlusions. However, data are limited comparing clinical outcomes after aspiration-first versus stentriever-assisted aspiration for thrombectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared procedure times and radiographic outcomes after two mechanical thrombectomy techniques (aspiration first or stentriever). To minimize bias and variability inherent to multi-operator series, we assessed consecutive patients with cerebrovascular occlusions treated by a single surgeon during a 1 year period at two stroke centers. Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) grades were assessed by an investigator blinded to treatment. RESULTS: Data from 93 patients (median age 70 years) were analyzed: 73 patients (78.5%) were treated with a strentriever-first strategy and 20 (21.5%) were treated with aspiration first, with stentriever rescue therapy required in only three of these cases following unsuccessful aspiration. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, sites of occlusion, or rates of tandem occlusions between aspiration-first and stentriever-assisted groups (p≥0.36). The rate of first-pass eTICI ≥2b was 75.0% (15/20) for aspiration-first and 52.1% (38/73) for strentriever-first groups (p=0.07), while the rate of final eTICI ≥2b was 100% (20/20) and 82.2% (60/72), respectively (p=0.04). The aspiration-first technique was associated with procedural times ≤25 min in a multivariable analysis (adjusted OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.15 to 18.39; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-surgeon series, an aspiration-first technique was associated with a statistically significant improvement in eTICI outcomes and faster procedure times compared with stentriever-assisted aspiration. Further prospective studies are necessary to minimize selection bias inherent in this study design.
Keywords
device, stroke, technique, thrombectomy
Medical Subject Headings
Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cerebrovascular Disorders (diagnostic imaging, surgery); Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paracentesis (methods); Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Stents; Thrombectomy (methods); Treatment Outcome; Vascular Access Devices
Publication Date
7-1-2021
Publication Title
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
E-ISSN
1759-8486
Volume
13
Issue
7
First Page
614
Last Page
618
PubMed ID
32958518
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016547
Recommended Citation
Fredrickson, Vance L.; Bonney, Phillip A.; Rangwala, Shivani D.; Catapano, Joshua S.; Cole, Tyler S.; Cavalcanti, Daniel D.; Majmundar, Neil; Wilkinson, D Andrew; San Roman, Luis; Waters, Michael F.; Albuquerque, Felipe C.; and Ducruet, Andrew F., "Comparison of aspiration-first versus stentriever-first techniques in performing mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions" (2021). Translational Neuroscience. 1312.
https://scholar.barrowneuro.org/neurobiology/1312