Does comorbid depression and anxiety portend poor long-term outcomes following surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis? Five-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

Authors

Joseph DiDomenico, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.Follow
S Harrison Farber, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Michael S. Virk, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jakub Godzik, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
Sarah E. Johnson, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mohamad Bydon, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Praveen V. Mummaneni, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Erica F. Bisson, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Steven D. Glassman, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Andrew K. Chan, Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Dean Chou, Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Kai-Ming Fu, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Christopher I. Shaffrey, Departments of9Neurosurgery and.
Anthony L. Asher, Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Domagoj Coric, Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Eric A. Potts, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Kevin T. Foley, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Tennessee, Semmes Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee.
Michael Y. Wang, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida.
John J. Knightly, Maxim Spine, Cedar Knolls, New Jersey.
Paul Park, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Tennessee, Semmes Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee.
Mark E. Shaffrey, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Jonathan R. Slotkin, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania; and.
Regis W. Haid, Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia.
Juan S. Uribe, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jay D. Turner, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

Document Type

Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depression and anxiety are associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery. However, the influence of these conditions on achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar spine surgery, as well as the potential compounding effects of comorbid depression and anxiety, is not well understood. This study explores the impact of comorbid depression and anxiety on long-term clinical outcomes following surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospectively collected Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients with surgically treated grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis from 12 centers were included. Preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were recorded, including self-reported depression and/or anxiety. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded: the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for back pain (NRS-BP), NRS score for leg pain (NRS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts: no self-reported depression or anxiety (non-SRD/A), self-reported depression or anxiety (SRD/A), or presence of both comorbidities (SRD+A). Changes in PROs over time, satisfaction rates, and rates of MCID were compared. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to establish independent associations. RESULTS: Of the 608 patients, there were 452 (74.3%) with non-SRD/A, 81 (13.3%) with SRD/A, and 75 (12.3%) with SRD+A. Overall, 91.8% and 80.4% of patients had ≥ 24 and ≥ 60 months of follow-up, respectively. Baseline PROs were universally inferior for the SRD+A cohort. However, at 60-month follow-up, changes in all PROs were greatest for the SRD+A cohort, resulting in nonsignificant differences in absolute NRS-BP, NRS-LP, ODI, and EQ-5D across the 3 groups. MCID was achieved for the SRD+A cohort at similar rates to the non-SRD/A cohort. All groups achieved > 80% satisfaction rates with surgery without significant differences across the cohorts (p = 0.79). On multivariable regression, comorbid depression and anxiety were associated with worse baseline PROs, but they had no impact on 60-month PROs or 60-month achievement of MCIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower baseline PROs, patients with comorbid depression and anxiety achieved comparable rates of MCID and satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis to those without either condition. This quality-of-life benefit was durable at 5-year follow-up. These data suggest that patients with self-reported comorbid depression and anxiety should not be excluded from consideration of surgical intervention and often substantially benefit from surgery.

Medical Subject Headings

Humans; Female; Male; Spondylolisthesis (surgery, complications); Lumbar Vertebrae (surgery); Middle Aged; Depression (epidemiology, psychology); Anxiety (epidemiology, psychology); Retrospective Studies; Comorbidity; Treatment Outcome; Aged; Databases, Factual; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Adult

Publication Date

11-1-2024

Publication Title

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine

E-ISSN

1547-5646

Volume

41

Issue

5

First Page

579

Last Page

588

PubMed ID

39241264

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24325

Share

COinS