Biomechanics of Nested Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Cages.

Department

Neurosurgery

Document Type

Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthrodesis is optimized when the structural graft occupies most of the surface area within a disc space. The transforaminal corridor inherently limits interbody size.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biomechanical implications of nested interbody spacers (ie, a second curved cage placed behind a first) to increase disc space coverage in transforaminal approaches.

METHODS: Seven lumbar human cadaveric specimens (L3-S1) underwent nondestructive flexibility and axial compression testing intact and after transforaminal instrumentation at L4-L5. Specimens were tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) interbody, (3) interbody plus bilateral pedicle screws and rods (PSR), (4) 2 nested interbodies, and (5) 2 nested interbodies plus PSR.

RESULTS: Mean range of motion (ROM) with 1 interbody vs 2 nested interbodies, respectively, was: flexion, 101% vs 85%; extension, 97% vs 92%; lateral bending, 127% vs 132%; and axial rotation, 145% vs 154%. One interbody and 2 nested interbodies did not differ significantly by loading mode (P > .10). With PSR, ROM decreased significantly compared with intact, but not between interbody and interbody plus PSR or 2 interbodies plus PSR (P > .80). Mean vertical height during compressive loading (ie, axial compressive stiffness) was significantly different with 2 nested interbodies vs 1 interbody alone (P < .001) (compressive stiffness, 89% of intact vs 67% of intact, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Inserting a second interbody using a transforaminal approach is anatomically feasible and nearly doubles the disc space covered without affecting ROM. Compressive stiffness significantly increased with 2 nested interbodies, and foraminal height increased. Evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of nested interbodies is underway.

Medical Subject Headings

Aged; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Screws; Female; Humans; Internal Fixators; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Pliability; Posture; Radiography; Range of Motion, Articular; Rotation; Spinal Fusion

Publication Date

2-1-2016

Publication Title

Neurosurgery

ISSN

1524-4040

Volume

78

Issue

2

First Page

297

Last Page

304

PubMed ID

26348015

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1227/NEU.0000000000001005

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS