Title

Comparison of dural grafts in Chiari decompression surgery: Review of the literature.

Department

Neurosurgery

Document Type

Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decompression of Chiari malformation is a common procedure in both pediatric and adult neurosurgery. Although the necessity for some bony removal is universally accepted, other aspects of Chiari surgery are the subject of debate. The most controversial points include the optimal amount of bony removal, the use of duraplasty (and the type of material), the need for subarachnoid dissection, and the need for tonsillar shrinkage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We critically reviewed the literature to elucidate the risks and benefits of different graft types and to clarify optimal treatment options therein. Based on our search results, 108 relevant articles were identified. With specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, we noted three studies that directly compared two tlpes of dural substitutes in Chiari malformation surgery.

RESULTS: Our review did not support the superiority of either autologous or nonautologous grafts when duraplasty is employed. Our institutional experience, however, dictates that when the pericranium is available and of good quality, it should be utilized for duraplasty. It is non-immunogenic, inexpensive, and capable of creating a watertight closure with the dura.

CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between the three comparative studies analyzed are likely attributable to increases in pericranial quality and thickness with maturity. Future randomized studies with large numbers and the power to resolve differences in the relatively low rates of complications in Chiari surgery are warranted.

Publication Date

1-1-2010

Publication Title

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine

ISSN

0976-9285

Volume

1

Issue

1

First Page

29

Last Page

37

PubMed ID

20890412

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4103/0974-8237.65479

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS